<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentários em: Último processador Intel nos novos iMacs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appletuga.com/ultimo-processador-intel-nos-novos-imacs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appletuga.com/ultimo-processador-intel-nos-novos-imacs/</link>
	<description>Reiventa a ideia de Blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Por: Marco</title>
		<link>http://www.appletuga.com/ultimo-processador-intel-nos-novos-imacs/comment-page-1/#comment-10255</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appletuga.com/?p=759#comment-10255</guid>
		<description>no Macrumors:

Update: It appears that Intel is once again providing a custom chip for Apple in the 3.06 GHz top-end model. According to TGDaily the chip is still a Santa Rosa-era chip but the only technical difference between it and the upcoming X9100 &quot;Montevina&quot; CPU appears to be the a 11 watt TDP differential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no Macrumors:</p>
<p>Update: It appears that Intel is once again providing a custom chip for Apple in the 3.06 GHz top-end model. According to TGDaily the chip is still a Santa Rosa-era chip but the only technical difference between it and the upcoming X9100 &#8220;Montevina&#8221; CPU appears to be the a 11 watt TDP differential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
